[59180] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: more on lame-delegation.org, seems to waste IP space and DNS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Tue Jun 17 11:36:43 2003
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: bicknell@ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20030617143217.GA82735@ussenterprise.ufp.org> from "Leo Bicknell" at Jun 17, 2003 10:32:17 AM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
quoted-printable returned as a favor to all
those who can't live w/o it.
such zone exist and process were(are?) in place
to create delegations like this.
>
>
>
> --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> In a message written on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 07:05:17PM -0700, william@elan=
> .net wrote:
> > If what they are doing is not ok, what would you propose?
>
> This is a bit of a sideways step, but...
>
> I'm sure a lot of people would like to be able to register a zone
> and not point it at any nameservers, and not even have it appear
> in the top level zone files. Many people "sit" on a zone for many
> reasons, and in most cases having to point them at a nameserver
> just to register it is pointless and stupid.
>
> If a domain could exist in that state, then these domains could
> just have the lame name servers removed from their records, possibly
> existing with no nameservers, until the owner pointed them at the
> right place.
>
> --=20
> Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
>
> --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQE+7yZxNh6mMG5yMTYRAmBFAJ9rsJjvhOM/3JEv5SuTec2jw9cotACfUlhy
> qU4SOQhoVDb32ZK2XTXOh4A=
> =eVZj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--
>
