[5917] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: GigaRouter (Was Re: Cisco as Big Brother))
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Partan)
Tue Oct 29 22:53:25 1996
From: Andrew Partan <asp@partan.com>
To: alex@relcom.eu.net
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 12:26:30 -0500 (EST)
Cc: asp@partan.com, dorian@cic.net, nanog@merit.edu, paul@vix.com
In-Reply-To: <AFFyGRoOWN@virgin.relcom.EU.net> from "alex@relcom.eu.net" at Oct 22, 96 10:14:39 pm
> We there are strictly controlling our customers via filters and access lists
> because we know exactly ip networks he have, and all channels he can use
> to anounce this networks, and so on - (except some peers).
I think that I agree with your approach.
> There exist RIPE and other data bases - yes. They does have
> route objects.
There are other parts of the config than just customer routes -
like interfaces, IGP/BGP issues, LAN/WAN stuff.
It would be interesting to work on something that tried to cover
more than just a few parts of the config, and that could handle
both cisco & gated configs (I'll take others as a bonus).
--asp@partan.com (Andrew Partan)
