[59139] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Mobile code security (was Re: rr style scanning of non-customers)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Butterworth)
Mon Jun 16 10:44:43 2003

Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:43:41 +0100 (BST)
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> the thing that actually burns my hash, is when my spam
> complaints or noc correspondance are robotically bounced because they
> contain dangerous mime attachments of type "message/rfc822" (spam
> examples) or "text/plain" (traceroute or tcpdump output). if your noc
> or abusedesk has such a robot protecting it, you ought to be ashamed.

Or they may be happy thinking their NOC is more 0day virus proof rather
than hoping a 3rd party will update their scanner in time

Who'd want to risk the NOC falling to the same problem that's just
taken out the network they're trying to fix?

brandon


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post