[59092] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPv6

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vadim Antonov)
Sat Jun 14 21:28:16 2003

Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 18:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vadim Antonov <avg@kotovnik.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3EEAEC65.5080701@foobar.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> At least there is general consensus among pretty much 
> everyone - with the exception of a small number of cranks - that IPv6 is 
> good. 

Now I'm officially a crank because i fail to see why IPv6 is any better
than slightly perked up IPv4 - except for the bottom line of box vendors
who'll get to sell more of the new boxes doing essentially the same thing.

--vadim



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post