[59089] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Rescheduled: P2P file sharing national security and personal security risks

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McBurnett, Jim)
Sat Jun 14 12:08:29 2003

Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:07:53 -0400
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>,
	"Richard Irving" <rirving@onecall.net>
Cc: "Sean Donelan" <sean@donelan.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


HMMM...=20
Well, in the US, there is even the threat of lawsuit from an Employee =
that
get pornographic SPAM email... should the employer not make
efforts to block it, the employee can sue.. BUT it is the same =
argument..
Do we take the bad with the good? do we allow P2P when it can create =
security issues?
All this should be regulated by corporations not govermentt..

IE: Every business model is different..
A defense contractor should definately block p2p, but does a computer =
gaming company need to block it?


The Entire issue goes back to the job description of security =
professional....
Balancing the operational needs of XYZ vs. the hassle of certain =
security needs....

That is all this is... Some Senator or Congress member got wind of a =
"potential"
security issue, and in light of Sept 11, EVERYTHING is being =
scrutinized...

Anyway..

I've said enuf.....
J



From: Stephen J. Wilcox
Hmm where do you draw the line.. peer2peer file sharing, MS Networking, =
SMTP,=20
telephones, snail mail, visiting foreign countries, meeting people at =
all.. ?

Seems a bit silly to me to be having the conversation at all, its people =
who=20
willingly leak this information not the mechanism used thats at fault

Steve


On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Richard Irving wrote:

>   After all, how many meetings are there going to
> be assessing the risk SMTP has on National Security ?
>=20
>   Or, as you mentioned, MS file sharing...
>=20
>   And, remember, SMTP is -already- proven guilty of said Risk,
> and a far more -probable- culprit in future compromises... !
>=20
> Reality Check.
>=20
> My .02c
>=20
> .Richard.
>=20
>    My, what interesting times we live in,
>       and darn it, important people noticed me! :{
>=20
> Sean Donelan wrote:
> >=20
> > June 10, 2003
> >=20
> > NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED FULL COMMITTEE HEARING
> > The Senate Committee on the Judiciary scheduled for Wednesday, June =
11,
> > 2003, at 2:00 p.m., on .The Dark Side of a Bright Idea: Could =
Personal
> > and National Security Risks Compromise the Potential of P2P =
File-Sharing
> > Networks?. has been rescheduled for Tuesday, June 17, 2003 at 2:00 =
p.m.
> > in Room 226 of the Senate Dirksen Building.
> >=20
> > By order of the Chairman
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > I wonder if anyone is going to mention that Microsoft Network =
Neighborhood
> > file sharing is a form of P2P file sharing.
>=20
>=20
>=20


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post