[59020] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Another hijacked range???
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Haesu)
Thu Jun 12 01:50:45 2003
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:50:02 -0400
From: Haesu <haesu@towardex.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306111515100.19971-100000@sokol.elan.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
and woah, what is this? :-)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3029809556&category=11175
-hc
--
Sincerely,
Haesu C.
TowardEX Technologies, Inc
WWW: http://www.towardex.com
E-mail: haesu@towardex.com
Cell: (978) 394-2867
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 03:15:30PM -0700, william@elan.net wrote:
>
>
> > http://www.securityfocus.com/news/5654
> >
> > Why didnt the County file charges? hijacking... thats terrorism right? :-)
>
> This is not the same "hijacking" and you know it!
>
> But they can file charges for identity fraud and theft of resources. For
> FBI to investigate they want $5000 of losses from the victim (or victims).
>
> Also when IP block is sold, this is profiting from illegally obtained
> goods (well not "goods" but they can classify it as such). This is fraud
> of different type (as somebody else pointed legally this would be
> "Pecunary fraud through misrepresentation of ownership") and they can
> also prosecute those who got the money but again highier amounts then
> $500 are needed for them to get really into this. Multiple confirmed
> cases of buying ip blocks from the same person/groupwould help there.
>
> (Note: I incidently posted reply to this email on another mail list,
> apologies to those who have see this twice)
>
> ---
> William Leibzon
> Elan Communications Inc.
> william@elan.net
