[58880] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: About the address allocation convention between ISPs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Teng Fei)
Wed Jun 4 13:37:57 2003
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:34:59 +0000 (UTC)
From: Teng Fei <tfei@ipanema.ecs.umass.edu>
To: "Robert D. Maynard" <robert@ojai.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <0d2f01c32abd$736bdc60$6501a8c0@slurpie>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Dear Mr. Maynard,
Thank you very much!
Sincerely
Teng
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Robert D. Maynard wrote:
> Teng,
>
> See here for unnumbered interface information:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/20.html
>
>
>
> -Robert Maynard
> Vice President of Network Operations
> Alliance Information Systems, LLC
> mailto:robert@ojai.net
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> Teng Fei
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:11 AM
> To: Darin Wayrynen
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: About the address allocation convention between ISPs
>
>
> Dear Mr. Wayrynen,
>
> Thank you very much for your reply. What do you mean by "unnumbered
> interfaces"? Also could you please confirm my question that if the
> customer's address block was not obtained from the provider, it is also
> a
> convention that the provider will provider the /30 address for the
> inter-domain link?
>
> >From the replys, it seems to me that there is no way to tell which
> link is indeed the inter-domain link, if the two ASes are peers. But
> for
> customer-providers, I can guess with confidence. Could I get these
> information from the IPSes' or PoP's website, about who are their
> customers/peers? And how exactly the addresses were assigned?
>
> Sincerely
>
> Teng
>
>
