[5875] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: You are right [was Re: Ungodly packet loss rates]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (alex@relcom.eu.net)
Tue Oct 29 10:59:00 1996
From: alex@relcom.eu.net
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 96 18:47:23 +0300
To: jhall@rex.isdn.net, marten@BayNetworks.com
Cc: alex@relcom.eu.net, nanog@merit.edu
I can't say about Bay routers, but I know one system admin who was
caused (by him manager) to build IP/IPX network on Bay routers.
He hate Bay and dreams about Cisco. It's terrible...
Yes, it looks fine, but it's terrible device. Configuration, reloading, etc.,.. -
good hardware and bad software (yet).
But _nanog_ is not place for this flame - everybody may have him opinion.
And (even if somebody hate Bay's) there is a lot of cases when Bay is better
than other routers.
>
> Jeremy,
>
> The statements below contain so many inaccuracies that I am not even
> going to try to correct them... I think this kind of needless and
> completely inaccurate bashing is *way* out of line...
>
> -Marten
>
> "Mr. Jeremy Hall" <jhall@rex.isdn.net> writes
---
Aleksei Roudnev, Network Operations Center, Relcom, Moscow
(+7 095) 194-19-95 (Network Operations Center Hot Line),(+7 095) 239-10-10, N 13729 (pager)
(+7 095) 196-72-12 (Support), (+7 095) 194-33-28 (Fax)
