[58699] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IANA reserved Address Space
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Fri May 30 08:12:34 2003
From: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: <Brennan_Murphy@NAI.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:12:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <FF6F5696A661404E8E2C0DF39A1D72B614CE72@sncexmb1.corp.nai.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Brennan_Murphy@NAI.com wrote:
=20
> I'm tasked with coming up with an IP plan for an very large lab
> network. I want to maximize route table manageability and
> router/firewall log readability. I was thinking of building this
> lab with the following address space:
>=20
> 1.0.0.0 /8
> 10.0.0.0 /8
> 100.0.0.0 /8
If you are using a completely disconnected *LAB* network then why don't
you use 'real' addresses and do the test like that simulating the
environment just as in 'the real world' (matrix onion layer 666 ;)
The only reason you should be worried about IANA is if you
where connecting this network to the internet or to other nets.
Greets,
Jeroen
