[58472] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: identity theft != spam

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland )
Thu May 15 13:58:40 2003

To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Richard Welty <rwelty@averillpark.net>, nanog@nanog.org,
	brunner@nic-naa.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 May 2003 19:39:16 +0200."
             <E19GMhI-0001Hc-T0@roam.psg.com> 
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:44:26 -0400
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> unfortunately, until proper legislation is passed, they are to some degree
> hamstrung by said mandate from congress.

The wait condition (FTC jurisdiction) is possibly eqivalent to the switch
from an opt-out regime to an opt-in regime, which three years ago I though
was likely in the first Gore/Lieberman term. At the time I worked for an ad
network, so I paid more attention to technical and policy nuances in all of
the three basic jurisdictions than I do now.

My crystal ball had an off-by-at-least-one error.

The serious bit of this is, expect _no_change_ at the Federal level until
conditions change.

Eric

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post