[58375] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The Cidr Report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lee Howard)
Fri May 9 18:08:34 2003
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 18:07:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lee Howard <lee.howard@mci.com>
To: "Larry J. Blunk" <ljb@merit.edu>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20030509151922.52F605E0E7@segue.merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
We're here, name differences notwithstanding.
We do counsel our customers to set no-export on their more-specifics,
and we're happy to show them how or set it up for them. When I see
customers on the CIDR report, I make sure they get a phone call to
explain why aggregation is good and how we can help.
Lee
On Fri, 9 May 2003, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 11:19:21 -0400
> From: Larry J. Blunk <ljb@merit.edu>
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: The Cidr Report
>
>
>
> Hmm, The USDA seems to be very active of late.
> CIDR Police (and UUnet) where are you?
>
>
> > ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
>
> Feb 07
> > AS4151 345 71 274 79.4% USDA-1 USDA
>
> March 14
> > AS4151 535 109 426 79.6% USDA-1 USDA
>
> April 11
> > AS4151 691 75 616 89.1% USDA-1 USDA
>
> May 09
> > AS4151 1083 77 1006 92.9% USDA-1 USDA
>
>
> SBC also seems to be moving up rapidly from out of nowhere.
>
> > ASnum NetsNow NetsAggr NetGain % Gain Description
>
> April 11
> > AS7132 802 414 388 48.4% SBIS-AS SBC Internet Services
>
> May 09
> > AS7132 963 208 755 78.4% SBIS-AS SBC Internet Services
>
