[58171] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How to prove 192.5.5.0/24 is authorized?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A Steenbergen)
Fri May 2 11:05:34 2003
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 11:05:03 -0400
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: brett watson <brett@the-watsons.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <7760BB9A-7C68-11D7-8F9A-000393CE28EA@the-watsons.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 11:36:55PM -0700, brett watson wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 23:27 America/Phoenix, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >Back to the original question Chris Morrow asked a long time ago. What
> >should be considered acceptable proof?
> >
> >If Paul Vixie showed up on my doorstep tomorrow, and asked me to route
> >192.5.5.0; what proof should I accept from him (or anyone) to
> >demostrate
> >beyond a reasonable doubt he has the authority to route a particular
> >network?
>
> oh! i know! because i know paul, and will personally vouch for him?
To which the response is usually something like:
"Then you are obviously a co-conspirator, and we will now begin
investigating your involvement. Please provide all of your information and
justify everything you are doing, before we post everything we can find on
you to a mailing list or newsgroup."
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
