[58140] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Who is announcing bogons?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Thu May 1 13:59:57 2003
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: hank@att.net.il (Hank Nussbacher)
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 11:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: bmanning@karoshi.com, paul@vix.com (Paul Vixie), nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.10_heb2.08.10305012039001.31886-100000@MaX.att.net.il> from "Hank Nussbacher" at May 01, 2003 08:41:49 PM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>
> On Thu, 1 May 2003 bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
>
> >
> > > > > > net 39 was left in my care by my previous boss.
> > >
> > > that time is past, and the purpose for which this was allocated was met,
> > > and you can return the block to IANA now.
> >
> > yes, and it looks like nearly all the cruft that was put into
> > play around that prefix is nearly gone.when its well and
> > truely dead, I'll be happy to turn it in.
>
> If all the cruft is nearly gone, why is there a need to still announce
> 39.0.0.0/8? Can you perhaps explain what EP/IX needs to have 39.0.0.0/8
> to be globally routed? Curious minds would like to know.
who said it needs to be globally routed?
