[58062] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Missing registrations (when is a bogon not a bogon)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Wed Apr 30 02:22:57 2003
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:20:23 +0200
To: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, nanog@merit.edu
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0304292328360.27805-100000@clifden.donelan.c
om>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 11:38 PM 29-04-03 -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
>Based on the e-mail I got, I think several people missed Hank Nussbacher
>and Barry Greene's presentation at the last NANOG.
We got a new volunteer, Terry Baranski to help out with the load.
>http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0302/ppt/hank.pdf
>
>In the presentation they list several ASN and Network blocks in use, but
>not registered in any database.
We just got Lucent to correct their announcements. They had been announcing:
Network Origin AS Description
135.0.0.0/13 10455 Lucent Technologies
and with the help of Internap they have now fixed their announcement to
comply with what appears in ARIN.
>The US Department of Defense (AS 568) wins the prize for the most
>unregistered network blocks being announced. But they weren't alone.
If anyone can help out here - it would be appreciated. We have been
sending emails to anyone and everyone in AS568 since January - all of them
generating not a single reply.
So if the US Military can hijack a few IPs, we will have a hard time
convincing spammers and their shills to stop hijacking other available
address space:
Network Origin AS Description
132.0.0.0/10 568 DISO-UNRRA
137.0.0.0/13 568 DISO-UNRRA
158.0.0.0/13 568 DISO-UNRRA
192.153.136.0/21 568 DISO-UNRRA
192.172.0.0/19 568 DISO-UNRRA
>If you are going to start blackholing unregistered network blocks, I
>suggest checking if the current user has nuclear weapons. But once again,
>which ISP's aren't filtering?
Obviously, there are some since we do see these announcements pop up here
and there.
-Hank
