|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: nanog@merit.edu From: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:27:15 +0100 Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu >> In brief, >> the paper's says that under certain assumptions the globally optimal >> latency would be only 25% better than the selfish result. >If I might, his model says the best is between 0% and a max of 25% >better than the selfish result. Selfish routing may actually get us the >best possible Internet, although that is not proven. This sounds a lot like the 80-20 rule. Selfish routing gets you 80%. Infinite knowledge will bring you up to 100% of what is possible but that presumably costs a very large amount of money. --Michael Dillon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |