[57728] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Low AS - Number
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dwight Ringdahl)
Mon Apr 21 11:47:38 2003
Reply-To: <dwightringdahl@yahoo.com>
From: "Dwight Ringdahl" <dwightringdahl@yahoo.com>
To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:46:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <200304211538.h3LFcktb003789@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Nope strictly for marketing reasons... ASN has almost no place in BGP
selection.
-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu]=20
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 11:39 AM
To: dwightringdahl@yahoo.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Low AS - Number=20
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 11:10:58 EDT, Dwight Ringdahl =
<dwightringdahl@yahoo.com>
said:
> Just a quick FYI, I am no longer with WebUseNet ASN 19151. I'll be
starting
> to build a new network over the next several months. Does anyone have =
a
low
> ASN I can buy/transfer as to not have one up in the 30,000s...
Lemme guess - not only do some places filter 69/8, they bogon-filter AS
numbers
over 32K as well? Or is there some other reason?
