[57388] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Abuse.cc ???
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Fri Apr 4 23:36:27 2003
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:35:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
Cc: Simon Lyall <simon.lyall@ihug.co.nz>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <390E55B947E7C848898AEBB9E5077060750B6B@msmdcfs01.msmgmt.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, McBurnett, Jim wrote:
> Yesterday, I got word from a network operator that 50 entries was not sufficient.
> So I parsed 4 days's worth and sent them over 1200 messages from their block..
> have not heard back yet..
I love the operators who deny the ip block belongs to them, so you send
them back a whois with the appropriate bits underlined.
This happens a *lot* with tier1's, who really should know better.
> Some ISP's either /dev/null all of it, or they can't stop their users
> or politics stop 'em..
With a lot of providers the official policy is to let the user do whatever
they want as long as the check doesnt bounce and as long as a police
officer doesnt arrive on the doorstep with a subpoena.
But boy do they make a stink when people blackhole them!
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
