[57077] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: is this true or... ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Fri Mar 28 10:34:01 2003
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:35:09 -0600
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
Cc: Tomas Daniska <tomas@tronet.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20030328151600.E0FCD7B4D@berkshire.research.att.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> but there may be session state -- it's bill HB 2121) only criminalizes the
> conduct if it's done "with intent to harm or defraud a communications
> service provider". Now, given the anti-NAT and anti-VPN tendencies of some
> broadband ISPs, I'm not necessarily thrilled, but it's not quite the
> same as was originally suggested.
>
Without looking it up (a little busy), there should be a Definitions
section defining communications service provider. Is the bill aimed at
ISP's or is it aimed at the actual Telco?
-Jack
*probably just creating noise*
