[56858] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 69/8 revisited
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McBurnett, Jim)
Wed Mar 19 20:27:22 2003
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:25:20 -0500
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
To: <jlewis@lewis.org>, "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen@sprunk.org>
Cc: "Scott Granados" <scott@wworks.net>,
"Rick Ernst" <erond@legendz.com>,
"North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes" <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
look at the location too... 61/8 is APNIC and 69 ARIN..
J
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jlewis@lewis.org [mailto:jlewis@lewis.org]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 5:02 PM
>To: Stephen Sprunk
>Cc: Scott Granados; Rick Ernst; North American Noise and Off-topic
>Gripes
>Subject: Re: 69/8 revisited
>
>
>
>On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if there's something special about 69/8... I=20
>can't recall
>> this sort of discussion for 61/8 through 68/8, at least=20
>after CIDR in the
>> former Class A space was initially validated.
>
>For a very interesting comparison, do groups.google.com searches for=20
>69.0.0.0/8 and then for 61.0.0.0/8. While the first is=20
>several pages of=20
>hits saying to block 69.0.0.0/8 as a bogon, all the links for=20
>61.0.0.0/8=20
>seem to suggest blocking that /8 due to spam.
>=20
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route
> System Administrator | therefore you are
> Atlantic Net | =20
>_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>
>
