[56840] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McBurnett, Jim)
Wed Mar 19 08:12:36 2003
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 08:08:06 -0500
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
To: "Daniel Abbey" <dabbey@edeltacom.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
One more thought:
If the company is a SPAM or other less than popular type,=20
I would keep a watch on SPAM-L and spamhaus.org
Look for you IP block.. Some networks flat out put=20
IP Access lists to block ranges for SPAM/XXXX..
J
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel Abbey [mailto:dabbey@edeltacom.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:57 AM
>To: nanog@merit.edu
>Subject: Co-lo best practices on IP allocations
>
>
>
>Are there any suggestions/ideas on best practices when it=20
>comes to co-lo
>allocation of addresses to its customers? Is there any site=20
>that may have
>some pointers? The dilemma is whether to charge or no to=20
>charge separate for
>the IPs. Should it be a cause built into their overall=20
>contract? Any ideas?
>
>
