[56803] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: APNIC returning 223/8 to IANA
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Mon Mar 17 09:19:09 2003
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:18:04 -0500
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20030317063108.GA26345@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 01:31:08AM -0500, Jared Mauch =
wrote:
> When you get a /8, you expect it to be fully usable. The
> APNIC posture here seems to make sense to me that its an issue
> that needs to be resolved. using one of the other currently
> reserved /8's while that issue plays out seems quite logical
> to me.
Just like the people who get 69/8 blocks should expect them to be
fully usable as well, right? Surely if one reserved /24 means you
can return space and get new space assigned then the inability to
reach some percentage of the internet is an even bigger, and more
immediate concern that should warrant the same treatment.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE+ddkcNh6mMG5yMTYRAsfcAJ9J03aTPp5JZSAVu3yTyOQrxWicyQCfeh+3
k5xjCWGq9hbPx2Uxxcbg7xA=
=wH2x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD--
