[56734] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: route filtering in large networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael K. Smith)
Wed Mar 12 23:45:54 2003
Reply-To: <mksmith@noanet.net>
From: "Michael K. Smith" <mksmith@noanet.net>
To: "'Jack Bates'" <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 20:44:36 -0800
In-Reply-To: <014201c2e915$b2b84140$3f154241@jackdell>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> >
> You think that's bad? Try this one. Contacted network to=20
> inform them that they had an access list on a router=20
> rejecting 69/8 and that 69/8 was recently handed out, blah=20
> blah blah. Get a call back saying that they found the route=20
> for 69 and removed it. Could I please try it again. To humor=20
> said person, I tried it again and got what I expected (A). My=20
> question is, if he's running an acl with a bogon list, why=20
> does he have a route (presumably static since it was removed)=20
> for 69/8? I'm tempted to start mailing out bananas.
>=20
Check out http://www.cymru.com/Documents/secure-ios-template.html
All of the various Bogons, including unassigned ranges, are represented =
with
a route to null0.
Mike
