|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:51:22 -0500 (EST) From: jlewis@lewis.org To: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> Cc: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>, North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <008801c2e7fa$9d552b40$93b58742@ssprunk> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > Come on, you're asking the root and/or TLD operators to renumber their > servers -- not a trivial task -- every few months to intentionally disable > their own service for what amounts to an academic experience. Not for academic experience, but to encourage people to fix their broken filters. And while renumbering a large network might be non-trivial, changing the IP or adding an IP alias on 13 individual servers should be a trivial operation. > These folks are in the business of running a critical system that requires > 100% uptime for hundreds of millions of users, and they do a damned good > job. Let them do it in peace, and find some other "must have" service (like > porn) to put in 69/8. 100% uptime for the service, not for each individual server. So now the 69/8 holders, in addition to driving a campaign to get others to fix their networks, should offer free hosting to porn sites? How about free hosting for spamvertized sites?...oh wait, that might make the problem worse :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |