[56626] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 69/8...this sucks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andy Dills)
Tue Mar 11 13:14:49 2003
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:11:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: Ejay Hire <ejay.hire@isdn.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1047376701@imac-en0.delong.sj.ca.us>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> In short, it doesn't. Longer answer, if the ISP configures his router
> correctly, he can actually refuse to accept advertisements from other
> sessions that are longer versions of prefixes received through this session.
>
> However, it's primarily intended to solve the non-malicious, but somewhat
> malignant problem of out-of-date bogon filters by people trying to do the
> right thing.
So why does it need to be done by somebody "official"? Why make
organizations who don't have route servers do this?
I've been peering with Rob's bogon server for a little while, and it works
great. All of my customers get routes that point the bogons to a traffic
sink on my network. If they were so inclined, they could sink that traffic
before leaving their network.
Andy
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Andy Dills 301-682-9972
Xecunet, LLC www.xecu.net
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access
