[56597] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Tue Mar 11 08:19:10 2003
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 13:15:53 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030311070157.0EEE75E385@segue.merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
DJR> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:01:51 +0700
DJR> From: Dr. Jeffrey Race
DJR> [C:\]ping 208.196.93.204
DJR> [C:\]host 208.196.93.204
1. You read the NANOG FAQ, yes? Please explain your post.
2. Did TCP attempts to various well-known ports stay in SYN_SENT,
switch to CONNECTED, or return a RST? Or did you not try?
Thanks for proving that experience in one sphere doesn't bring
any free credibility in another. You posted what you should not,
and gave the wrong answer at that.
If you want to go around bragging "i'm mad l33t, yo" without
skills to back it up, I suggest IRC as a better medium.
Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly
as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more
experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are
obvious.
Consider being an early adopter of IPv8.
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.
