[56551] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Simon Lyall)
Mon Mar 10 17:29:34 2003
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:28:55 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Simon Lyall <simon.lyall@ihug.co.nz>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <A143FE7FCBD54F49B4E5C11A5A9723B60D2C1A@IPO-SRV-01.ipoutlet.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Todd A. Blank wrote:
> I continue to agree that moving critical resources (see below) to these
> new blocks is the best approach I have seen or heard in the months since
> I made the original post. This approach punishes the clueless instead
> of the people that already know what the problem is (and have to live
> with it every day)
After this 69.0.0.0/8 thing is sorted out I guess we can move the
"critical resources" over to 202.0.0.0/7 to track down all the idiots
blocking that range (trying to decide if I should put a smilie here).
I nominate the arin.net nameservers.
Could someone publish a name of a valid resource (or even pingable ip) in
69/8 space? This would allow people to test their (and their upsteams)
filters quickly while we wait for the list to come out.
--
Simon Lyall. | Newsmaster | Work: simon.lyall@ihug.co.nz
Senior Network/System Admin | Postmaster | Home: simon@darkmere.gen.nz
Ihug Ltd, Auckland, NZ | Asst Doorman | Web: http://www.darkmere.gen.nz
