[56531] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 69/8...this sucks -- Centralizing filtering..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McBurnett, Jim)
Mon Mar 10 15:27:27 2003
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:26:40 -0500
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
To: "Jack Bates" <jbates@brightok.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
<SNIP>
>Oh, I agree that there are times when BGP is used in a single uplink
>scenario, but it is not common. However, someone pointed me to=20
>ip verify
>unicast source reachable-via any which seems to be available=20
>on some of the
>cisco Service provider releases. It's an interesting concept=20
>and I'm itching
>to play with it. If you aren't in my routing table, then why=20
>accept the IP
>address?
>
>-Jack
Well, If you don't access my address and I happen to be=20
a poor ole 69/8 or <FILL IN NEW NET BLOCK HERE>
then your customers may not be able to get to me...
But there are an aweful lot of ifs to this ^^^^^^^^^^.
And I don't remember that command syntax at all....
Yea, I want to test that too..
Maybe I can make a visit to the local Cisco office and borrow
some time in the Lab.... I want to see this is action, and how it
may affect my routing... or maybe I can get a quick answer from the =
local
CCIEs...
Hey have you checked the Feature Navigator and seen which versions it
is in? Catch me off-list....
Later,
J
