|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: "james" <hackerwacker@cybermesa.com> To: <nanog@merit.edu> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 16:15:26 -0700 Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu > So far the Deloder worm appears to be responding to normal congestion > feedback controls, limiting its network impact. Like CodeRed, Nimda, etc > some edge providers may need to implement network controls due to > scanning activities causing cache busting, but I suspect most network > backbones will not need to do anything. I agree this is not a backbone issue. Since we are an ISP and at the edge, it is a good place to drop this. Traffic is not as large, as of yet, as the SQL worm. Blocking port 445, for us, means far less $$ in support time to deal with abuse reports and infected users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |