[56346] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: spamcop.net?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Mon Mar 3 23:44:04 2003
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 23:43:56 -0500
To: "Christopher L. Morrow" <chris@UU.NET>,
blitz <blitz@macronet.net>
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@fugawi.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0303040251000.24141-100000@rampart.argfrp.us
.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Not for nothing, but there's so much time wasted with all these diversified
spam systems.
I've been reading about Barry Shein's proposals and I have to say I am on board
with a centralized -single- system based on his young, but intelligent, model.
http://www.internetweek.com/breakingNews/INW20021219S0003
I applaud RBL, spamcop, etc., but without funding and consolidation, it's
another
waste of offensive time that could be spent on a far more effective defense.
-M
At 02:51 AM 3/4/2003 +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, blitz wrote:
>
> >
> > Anyone having trouble getting to/ know of any issues with spamcop.net
> today?
> >
> > They seemed to have dropped off the radar from me...
> >
> > No pings
> > No traceroute
> >
> > but they still show registered at 216.127.43.89
> >
>
>laptop ~]$ t 216.127.43.89 80
>Trying 216.127.43.89...
>Connected to 216.127.43.89 (216.127.43.89).
>Escape character is '^]'.
>GET /
>
>hmm, there isnt anything returning right now, but it connects atleast :)
>
> > Tnx
> >
> > Marc
> > macronet.net
> >
Regards,
--
Martin Hannigan hannigan@fugawi.net
