[56341] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Deleskie)
Mon Mar 3 14:04:32 2003
From: Jim Deleskie <jdeleski@rci.rogers.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:01:58 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I know when we separated Concert from iMCI we where using the filters on
them, and they IMO would have been a peer, but then again Concert sould have
been a special case either way.
-Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny McPherson [mailto:danny@tcb.net]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:59 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Who uses RADB? [was BGP to doom us all]
Yes, at iMCI (we) had our own registry, MCI-RR, but we only used it
(in addition to data from the other IRRs) to generate customer prefix
filters, not peers.
Cable & Wireless still uses the RR, now know as CW-RR.
-danny
> As I remember and I could be wrong, its been a few years now, when I
worked
> for iMCI we did and we moved over to C&W we still did.
