[56285] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: anti-spam vs network abuse
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Charlie Clemmer)
Sat Mar 1 14:34:56 2003
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 13:32:38 -0600
To: lamour@UU.NET
From: Charlie Clemmer <cclemmer@nexgennetworks.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <pb0d6lb3p5a.fsf@camel.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 01:41 PM 3/1/2003 -0500, Michael Lamoureux wrote:
> andy> In this case, your door being unlocked cannot cause me
>andy> harm. However, an "unlocked proxy" can.
>
>Heh, so I guess you could make it his gun and the safety. Does that
>change your answer? ;-)
Heh ... I wasn't going to go there, but that's what I meant by being
prepared for my response. :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0
iQA/AwUBPmEK3qvEtUU05riwEQJ0CQCgsGRx8acSws4V4nQ6wJuodBtewukAoPOd
fYTiwDfn9DEn7yUGIW5esq4/
=m4Xq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
