[56255] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: anti-spam vs network abuse

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rob Thomas)
Fri Feb 28 22:21:51 2003

Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:20:41 -0600 (CST)
From: Rob Thomas <robt@cymru.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <E18ouQT-0000eM-00@roam.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Hi, NANOGers.

] and conversely, all attacks are not preceded by scanning.

Very true.  Most of the attack activity I monitor does not include
scanning activity or any other reconnaissance.  However, those who
attack often enjoy monitoring their progress.  This can be an
interesting (albeit difficult) way to trace back the attack to the
sources.

Thanks,
Rob.
-- 
Rob Thomas
http://www.cymru.com
ASSERT(coffee != empty);



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post