[56078] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 223.255.255.0/24
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Sun Feb 23 23:50:33 2003
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
To: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 20:49:05 -0800 (PST)
Cc: anne@apnic.net (Anne Lord), simon.lyall@ihug.co.nz (Simon Lyall),
bdragon@gweep.net, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <E18nASB-000ETq-00@roam.psg.com> from "Randy Bush" at Feb 24, 2003 01:42:58 PM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>
>
> > The outcome of the discussions at the Address Policy SIG will be posted
> > to this list.
>
> where, one hopes, discussion will continue, yes?
>
> randy
>
why would an APNIC/AP region specific issue need to be discussed
on the NANOG list and not the RIPE/AFNOG/et.al. regional ops lists?
This is a prefix delegated to the APregion and so they should be
the ones who set the policies for the prefixes they are responsible
for. I appreciate their willingness to share the outcome of their
deliberations, but why NAites have any special say in AP policies
is a bit beyond me.
--bill
