[55992] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: M$SQL cleanup incentives
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 20 16:36:26 2003
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:11:06 +0100."
<20030220215853.G61596-100000@sequoia.muada.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 16:34:58 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-384010154P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:11:06 +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum said:
> Seems to me that filtering is no longer necessary unless you have reason
> to believe your customers are going to install new vulnerable boxes or
> vulnerable software on existing boxes AND their pipe to you is so big
"new vulnerable boxes" has to be assumed as the default state for any new
installs, until such time as the vulnerability is patched in the base install,
and has been out for so long that installing the unpatched version will
inspire "ewww that's old" comments...
--==_Exmh_-384010154P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE+VUoCcC3lWbTT17ARAgpAAKCeXtf3QxWxcMSS5qnTOW9vCP7AJACg6XU5
ibLvCyrZCdpd0SznF+7ibtQ=
=1VJn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-384010154P--
