[55734] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: VoIP QOS best practices
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Feb 10 13:30:21 2003
To: Charles Youse <cyouse@register.com>
Cc: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:02:39 EST."
<BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A508948D516CA@ex2k01.corp.register.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:22:39 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-2036793918P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:02:39 EST, Charles Youse <cyouse@register.com> said:
> That doesn't seem to make a lot of sense - is it that QoS doesn't work as advertised?
Qos is designed for dealing with "who gets preference when there's a bandwidth
shortage". Most places are having a bandwidth glut at the moment, so the VoIP
traffic gets through just fine and QoS isn't able to provide much measurable
improvement.
--==_Exmh_-2036793918P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE+R+3vcC3lWbTT17ARAtP6AJ9wjDaCZ/xrBX33/PXD3b7d4l9lBwCffcta
9chg33lKooWde3LmtHB8qiQ=
=TPCd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-2036793918P--
