[5564] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco Memory.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Stratton)
Mon Oct 21 22:42:00 1996
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 21:32:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan@netrail.net>
To: Avi Freedman <freedman@netaxs.com>
cc: Patrick Lynch <plynch@jefferson.ind.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199610211721.NAA20062@access.netaxs.com>
On Mon, 21 Oct 1996, Avi Freedman wrote:
> > Nathan,
> >
> > I have to follow up on this comment you made. I work for an ISP in
> > Indianapolis called IHETS. We have 7 cisco 7500 series routers on our
> > backbone. Wre just spent a chunck of money to upgrade the RAM on them to
> > 64Meg. If yoiu are saying that regular SIMMS work in Cicso routers, then I'll
> > shoot myself in the foot. I'd like to know if you have used this method and
> > how well it works out in the field. Does latency increase with *unqualified*
> > Cisco memory, or is the *unqualified* *qualified* Cisco ram stuff just a big
> > ruse? Thanks for your input.
>
> I'd pay attention if they disqualify memory.
>
> But we've found that standard x36 16mb 70pin (60ns) simms work fine in
> 7500s. I suspect it'd either work or not - you won't get added latency...
I have used 70ns with no prob, but good to go with 60ns to be safe.
Nathan Stratton CEO, NetRail, Inc. Tracking the future today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone (703)524-4800 NetRail, Inc.
Fax (703)534-5033 2007 N. 15 St. Suite 5
Email sales@netrail.net Arlington, Va. 22201
WWW http://www.netrail.net/ Access: (703) 524-4802 guest
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about
itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own." Matthew 6:34
