[55550] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Internet Monitoring Center
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Jan 31 09:21:28 2003
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
Cc: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2003 04:21:40 CST."
<003401c2c849$61a27600$624b4041@jackdell>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:18:04 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_489875572P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 04:21:40 CST, Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net> said:
> in this. My question is why large providers couldn't interlink themselves
> and establish guidelines for notification and resolution of network issues.
> They manage it for peering, why not for overall performance and security
> issues?
"I'll get back to you Tuesday or when NANOG posts embarrass me" works for
peering issues, but not for security issues.
--
Valdis Kletnieks
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_489875572P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE+OoWccC3lWbTT17ARAseyAJ9yFAiHC2a3JP1Giyh9ZOXdrSUzbQCePaHD
Tb/ydEiS0RWkPtaHZTfcgjs=
=hq3L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_489875572P--
