[55521] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: mSQL Attack/Peering/OBGP/Optical exchange

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Thu Jan 30 10:17:28 2003

Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 15:36:14 +0100
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
To: David Diaz <techlist@smoton.net>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <p05200f46ba59c9137938@[10.0.1.3]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


>
> I have received information on router utilizations, some routers it 
> seems may have held up better then others.  That information is 
> useful.  But I am working on some optical exchange point/optical metro 
> designs and this might have a dramatic impact if one considers things 
> like OBGP, Uni 1.0, ODSI etc etc.
>
> A working hypothesis on the affect of this type of attack on a 
> dynamically allocated bandwidth network (such as an optical exchange 
> running OBGP etc) would have had a drastic affect on resources.  All 
> the available spare capacity would have likely be allocated out.  So 
> the "bucket" would have run dry.  Understanding that exchange points 
> of this type (or metro area dynamic layer1 transport networks) will 
> manage the total bandwidth needs to always maintain adequate available 
> capacity


The problem with ONI and MP<whatever>S models is that there is little 
or no correlation between the topology aware layers. You will most 
likely sooner or later end up in a situation where the layers will 
start to oscillate.

So, I would not build a optical IX around this model - if I would build 
a optical IX at all.

- kurtis -


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post