[555] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 206.82.160.0/22
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Doran)
Tue Sep 26 04:07:49 1995
From: Sean Doran <smd@icp.net>
To: davidc@apnic.net, nmw@haven.ios.com
Cc: cidrd@iepg.org, nanog@MERIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 04:05:03 -0400
Resent-From: nanog@MERIT.EDU
>I would be very interested in hearing people's opions
?regarding this aspect of current allocation guidelines.
It's a joke.
Moreover, it's a stupid joke that will wreck the value of registries
as sources of accurate information.
If the contact person or an officer of the contact organization
tells me that a prefix is now to be used by another party,
whether it's bought or traded or inherited or sold or whatever,
I don't care, I'll route it, provided it's aggregatable into
something reasonably short.
And if the registries don't update to the new contacts,
so what?
Sean.
