[55028] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: att.net email issues?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chris Adams)
Fri Jan 24 21:09:51 2003
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 20:09:20 -0600
From: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <001301c2c40d$85f5e9a0$66144241@jackdell>; from jbates@brightok.net on Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 07:03:07PM -0600
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Once upon a time, Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net> said:
> I'm hoping that more large ISP's will make valid reverses a requirement.
> Everyone will conform to meet what the largest user bases require and allow
> the smaller guys who want to revamp able to safely do so. This is the
> standard premise for any form of migration. Can anyone get aol to enforce
> it, please?
It is funny that AT&T is doing this - we recently had a connection to
AT&T installed and repeatedly asked for reverse DNS on the interface IPs
(so traceroute would "look nice" for example), and it was never done.
--
Chris Adams <cmadams@hiwaay.net>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
