| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:34:55 -0500 From: Jeff Wasilko <jeffw@smoe.org> To: nanog@merit.edu Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <3e4623a3.22088661@pita.alt.net> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:26:16PM +0000, Tim Thorne wrote: > > "Dave Howe" <DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > > >there then followed a short conversation that amounted to that - given that > >$mydomain was working fine, they would *not* look at the problem for > >$contractorsdomain unless $contractor contacted them about it. I found > >postmaster@contractorsdomain worked fine, so managed to get *that* guy to > >get uunet to fix the problem (and it was literally a thirty second fix). > > You can hardly expect an ISP to change an MX record on the opinion > (right or wrong) of a third party. It could be someone trying a little Correct me if I'm wrong, but the original poster wasn't trying to get UUnet to change an MX record. Rather, the uunet-provided MX host for the domain was not set up to 'relay' mail for that domain, and the original poster was trying to get UUnet to fix their MTA config. -j
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |