[54691] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: US-Asia Peering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Mon Jan 13 16:25:02 2003
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 22:25:27 +0100
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <g38yxpzdk3.fsf@as.vix.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>> How do you see the failed AMS-IX expansion fit into this?
>>
>> My (very simplified) summary of what happened was that :
>> ...
>> At the time of the origin of the discussion I was peering
>> co-ordinator at
>> KPNQwest, and would have pulled-out of AMS-IX if the plans (and
>> KQ..:) )
>> would have moved on.
>
> well of course i'm not bill, but (naturally) i will comment anyway.
> was
> AMS-IX planning to expand beyond its original metro and bridge all the
> XP
> switches together? if so then i understand exactly why KQ and other
> ISP's
> would have pulled out of AMS-IX in protest (and in fear). however, if
> the
> expansion was intra-metro, then i must be confused, because KQ's major
> source of bandwidth revenue should have been inter-metro not
> intra-metro.
>
They planed to interconnect other (well, one) other exchanges in NL.
Best regards,
- kurtis -
