|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20030107174140.044ccec0@pop3.jml.net> "from Joel Rowbottom at Jan 7, 2003 05:44:54 pm" To: Joel Rowbottom <joel.rowbottom@centralnic.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 18:07:19 +0000 (GMT) Cc: Steve Dyer <steve@uk.com>, "Verd, Brad" <bverd@verisign.com>, nanog@merit.edu, nom-steer@lists.nominet.org.uk, rcochetti@verisign.com From: neil@DOMINO.ORG (Neil J. McRae) Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu > CentralNic have actually been working with this system for around 12 months > now, and it's pretty cool. It works with a lot more browsers than the VGRS > one, and requires no client or server-side plugins or patches :) > > It's really rather good at providing a seamless end-to-end IDN solution for > web browsers; granted there are problems with Squid and such, but any IDN > solution will have problems with things which filter. > > Personally I think it's a good transition for IDNs - but then again I've > said that before ;) > Have you looked at RFC 2026?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |