[54243] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Wed Dec 18 13:56:30 2002
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:55:58 -0500
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0212180957410.2311-100000@sokol.elan.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:02:13AM -0800, william@elan=
.net wrote:
> I pointed that out on another list too but somebody else responded that=
=20
> abovenet to aol connection is congested as it is and more then likely=20
> would not have been able to take all the extra traffic. I'm not a custome=
r=20
There are no congestion issues between 6461 and 1668 at this time.
If someone believes there is a problem please have them contact me
off list so I can look into it.
I can make no comment on the volume of traffic, having no idea what
volume is involved.
If you consider the paths that are available for a moment, I think
most people can deduce why they are choosing the Level 3 path, and
it has nothing to do with performance.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE+AMS+Nh6mMG5yMTYRApwRAJ94Y744vXn4xEQFhMmq6FgtXVwJUACfbcwQ
goU86BwzJkZHLr0oLE6u8HM=
=cx8m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE--
