[54220] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Alternative to NetFlow for Measuring Traffic flows
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dre)
Tue Dec 17 14:38:16 2002
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 11:37:50 -0800
From: dre <andre@operations.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20021217112557.A9489@operations.net>; from andre@operations.net on Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:25:58AM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:25:58AM -0800, dre wrote:
> Prothat include capex+opex to a variety of vendors (creating vendor
> dependence) with new "extra" routers (equipment), and seemingly
> costly exchange point "extra" connectivity, with "extra" racks and
> power requirements with monthly re-occurring charges - well that's
> just not intuitively cost-effective, now is it?
s/Prothat/Projects that/
stupid vi. ;>
dre
