[54158] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco OSMs for 65XX
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Wed Dec 11 15:42:02 2002
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:41:32 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Jeff Nelson <jnelson@rackspace.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <001c01c2a153$f1e724d0$6700a8c0@jnull2>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Expense?
(I'll preface this by saying that even though I have not used OSM, I have
used 6509/MSFC2 a lot and like it greatly).
Expense?
Used Juniper gear, even when re-certing it, is still probably orders of
magnitudes cheaper than OSM.
Live life. Get a couple M20's, and some 6509-SUP2 (non-MSFC) with GE
uplinks. You'll be happy, it will be stable, and you'll not spend a lot of
money.
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Jeff Nelson wrote:
>
> I'm looking into an edge 65XX solution for a new DC with multiple sonet
> connections to GigE and I was hoping for some real world feedback.
> Particularly, we're considering the OSM-4OC3-POS-SI+ and the
> OSM-2OC12-POS-SI+. While performance and redundancy may best be served
> by GSRs with engine3/4 linecards or the big J, I'm not convinced the
> expense is worth the additional costs.
>
> Any hands-on experiences or 3rd party performance statistics are most
> welcome.
>
> Thank you,
> jeff
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
