[54081] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Baker)
Tue Dec 10 12:37:59 2002
From: "Joel Baker" <lucifer@lightbearer.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:37:28 -0700
To: Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>
Cc: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>, nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: Vadim Antonov <avg@exigengroup.com>,
"Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0212100618270.30829-100000@arch.exigengroup.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:24:42AM -0800, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> There's a big difference: address allocation (and key distribution) is
> off-line, and is not involved in operation of the routing system.
> Its failure doesn't cause network malfunction, just aggravation of new
> customers.
Hmmmm. Didn't this entire thread start with "just aggravation of new
customers" - to wit, folks in 69/8 having problems reaching places with
filters that haven't been updated?
s/filters that haven't been updated/key databases that have not been
updated/, and it looks like we're right back where we started...
--=20
***************************************************************************
Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com
lucifer@lightbearer.com http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE99iZY13sEBdj5qMURAqexAJ43NzIUN9jTeW8JVCC6roYJZZys9ACggni6
D1QklZNN1QKWkCXYonSt0K0=
=1z90
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr--
