[53877] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: dontaing bgp config files [Re: Risk of Internet collapse grows]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Meyer)
Mon Dec 2 08:42:22 2002
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 05:42:32 -0800
From: David Meyer <dmm@sprint.net>
To: Ratul Mahajan <ratul@cs.washington.edu>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20021201215718.W14283-100000@krypton.cs.washington.edu>; from ratul@cs.washington.edu on Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 11:03:22PM -0800
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Ratul,
>> understanding of routing (especially inter-domain) in the research
>> community is really primitive. this precludes us from having realistic
>> routing models. we recently started working on understanding prevalent
>> inter-domain routing policies. the ultimate goal is to improve the
>> efficiency, robustness and expressiveness of routing protocols.
>> http://www.cs.washington.edu/research/networking/policy-inference/
It is not clear if you mean that tools (e.g. BGP) are
primitive, languages to express policy in BGP are
primitive, or application of what we have (BGP + whatever
language you use) is primitive. Which is it (or which
subset)?
Thanks,
Dave
