[53785] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Risk of Internet collapse grows
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Diaz)
Wed Nov 27 08:21:13 2002
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:20:41 -0500
To: Irwin Lazar <ILazar@burtongroup.com>, nanog@merit.edu
From: David Diaz <davediaz@smoton.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--============_-1173719251==_ma============
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
I think this is old news. There was a cover story back in 1996 time
frame on Mae_east. We have to ask how likely is this with many of
the top backbones doing private peering over local loops, how much
damage would occur if an exchange point where hit?
I have 2 different questions. 1) In the current environment, are
peering circuits running fuller then in previous years. I ask after
there has been questions on UUNET/L3 Capacity in europe etc. If the
case is so, then an attack in one peering location/region might cause
major problems as other peering sessions become overloaded.
2) Wouldnt an attach on particular servers that are NOT redundant
have a more significant affect? Are microsoft's servers mirrored?
Just posing a scenario.
Thought this might be worth passing on:
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2514651.stm>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2514651.stm
There is a recent book out called "Linked: The New Science of
Networks" which details the potential for causing widespread Internet
damage by targeting a few hubs instead of random or widespread
attacks against large numbers of hosts. This simulation seems to
backup the author's concerns.
Irwin
--
David Diaz
dave@smoton.net [Email]
pagedave@smoton.net [Pager]
www.smoton.net [Peering Site under development]
Smotons (Smart Photons) trump dumb photons
--============_-1173719251==_ma============
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>Re: Risk of Internet collapse
grows</title></head><body>
<div>I think this is old news. There was a cover story back in
1996 time frame on Mae_east. We have to ask how likely is
this with many of the top backbones doing private peering over local
loops, how much damage would occur if an exchange point where
hit?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I have 2 different questions. 1) In the current
environment, are peering circuits running fuller then in previous
years. I ask after there has been questions on UUNET/L3 Capacity
in europe etc. If the case is so, then an attack in one peering
location/region might cause major problems as other peering sessions
become overloaded.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>2) Wouldnt an attach on particular servers that are NOT
redundant have a more significant affect? Are microsoft's
servers mirrored?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Just posing a scenario.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="-1">Thought this might be worth passing
on:</font></div>
<div><a
href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2514651.stm"><font
face="Arial"
size="-1">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/2514651.stm</font></a></div
>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="-1">There is a recent book out called
"Linked: The New Science of Networks" which details the
potential for causing widespread Internet damage by targeting a few
hubs instead of random or widespread attacks against large numbers of
hosts. This simulation seems to backup the author's
concerns.</font></div>
<div> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="-1">Irwin</font></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div><br>
David Diaz<br>
dave@smoton.net [Email]<br>
pagedave@smoton.net [Pager]<br>
www.smoton.net [Peering Site under development]<br>
Smotons (Smart Photons) trump dumb photons<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--============_-1173719251==_ma============--
