[53747] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Cyberattack FUD

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Schwartz)
Fri Nov 22 19:52:49 2002

From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
To: <avg@exigengroup.com>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:52:14 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211221539170.31523-100000@arch.exigengroup.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:31:30 -0800 (PST), Vadim Antonov wrote:

>In the "regular" skyjacking the attackers want to get ransom, or=
 divert an
>airplane to someplace.  They'll get cooperation from pilots, too=
 - without
>any need to be present in the cockpit.  So if it is known that=
 the policy
>is not to let anyone in, no matter what happens to passengers,=
 the
>attackers wouldn't even try.  In fact, they don't, on airlines=
 which have
>this policy.  Letting deranged people in cockpit, in fact,=
 places _all_
>passengers at risk of an unintended crash (imagine an attacker=
 getting
>agitated and killing pilots, or simply pulling knobs - there=
 were
>incidents when _little kids_ allowed to cockpit crashed the=
 commercial
>planes).
>
>The rules of engagement were patently absurd

=09Let me see if I understand you correctly. You have a mentally=
 disturbed man 
with two guns and a belt full of bullets on a plane. He wants to=
 speak to the 
pilot face-to-face. He says if the pilots don't come out, he's=
 going to shoot 
the 236 passengers one-by-one. If you were the pilot, before=
 9/11, how many 
passengers would you let him shoot before you came out? And what=
 consequences 
would you expect to face when/if you landed safely?

=09I'm sorry, your reasoning might apply to some fantasy world but=
 it would not 
have seemed sensible to any rational person in the United States=
 prior to 
those terrorist attacks.=09They succeeded because nobody was=
 expecting them. As 
soon as anyone expected them, they failed. This is why Todd=
 Beamer's plane 
didn't reach its target.

[snip]

=09As for your arguments about the benefits of government=
 intervention in the 
computer market and other types of social engineering, I just=
 hope people 
like you stay out of power. At least Microsoft only uses their=
 own resources 
to push their vision of the future. You are welcome to use yours=
 to push 
yours.

=09DS



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post